What happens to knowledge when we make it measurable
I build systems that turn human expertise into data. These essays are me taking that seriously — what it's good for, and what it quietly costs.
Long read · In draft
Legibility engines: what workforce intelligence does to tacit skill
Some knowledge can't be written down — the operator who hears a bearing failing, the account manager who knows which clause the client will actually fight over. James Scott called it metis. An entire software category now exists to render it legible.
The argument of this essay is that legibility isn't neutral capture. Specifying a skill finely enough to measure it is the same act that specifies it finely enough to automate it. I build these systems for a living, which I think obliges me to be precise about the trade rather than sentimental about it.
The moment you can score a skill, you have written most of the spec for replacing it.
Essay · In draft
The firm as a vessel
A counter-reading, drawing on Schumacher, the Toyota production system, and the German Mittelstand — firms that treat building human capability as a deliberate output rather than a cost leak. If the first essay describes a curve, this one asks who has managed to sit off it, and what they gave up to do so.
Published · Report
The attenuation trap
On measurement reliability in skills assessment. When two noisy instruments are correlated, the observed relationship is pulled toward zero. Spearman's correction for it is a century old and routinely ignored by people shipping skills-match scores today. A practical piece about why your model's ceiling is often your rater's floor.